mudracersassociation Forum Index
mudracersassociation
Hosted by freeforums.org
Welcome
Welcome to mudracersassociation.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

pro stock ''block''
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mudracersassociation Forum Index -> MRA Class Rules Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hostile projectile



Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 231
Location: paulding,oh

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:11 am    Post subject: pro stock ''block'' Reply with quote

i think that aluminum blocks should be aloud in pro stock as long as the weight is still 3000#'s and were limited to on carb what diff does it make?

_________________
Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jeff funk



Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Location: newton, Ia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:16 am    Post subject: Re: pro stock ''block'' Reply with quote

hostile projectile wrote:
i think that aluminum blocks should be allowed in pro stock as long as the weight is still 3000#'s and were limited to one carb what diff does it make?


If the car meets min weight, and it is a unlimited CI class it really bears no reason for a no alum block rule to be in place, IMO

There are alum blocks out there now capable of 900 ci plus, but have fun with feeding it with a single dominator.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
shotgun



Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 36
Location: wickliffe, ky

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had the same opinion for a few years now. minimum weights are a crock also Exclamation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Graham



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 523
Location: Missouri, USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the issue that may arise is that one would assume if you can run an aluminum block in Pro Stock you could also run one in Outlaw Pro Stock where dual carbs & nitrous are permitted (thus, feeding that 900" monster would be possible).


Scott

_________________
Scott Graham
MRA #103
Hot Street Class
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
traveler



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Tampa, Fl.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting !

The two factor that first come to mind are - Weight and Cost. While I do not know the exact numbers - it will take about 150 lbs. off the front end and about $4000 off your wallet. (But I will admit that I have though about alum. small blocks - as a lower cost alternative to a monster big block and to help them make the lower weight).

As for Minimum weights - I personally do not like them. As long as we spec. the chassis and tubing size (for safety reasons).

Just as a reminder - there are Pro-stock cars out there right now that are lighter then some of the Pro-mod rails. With the new rules for MRA Outlaw-pro stock - may become even lighter.

As for the Outlaw Pro-stock class having alum blocks - It would put it so close to the Pro-mod class - that you might as well combine the two (something that I see could happen - because there seems to be a decline in Pro-mod cars and the performance of the two are or will be very close). But that's just my opinion.

As for feeding a 800 or 900 c.i. with one 4 barrel - There are single carbs out there now that flow close to 2000 cfm. Even with a good modified 1250 I have to think that a good tuner could easily push over 1450 hp out of a 813 and with some of the "outlaw fuels" that are out there 1550 - 1600 could be obtainable.

_________________
terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354

e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hostile projectile



Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 231
Location: paulding,oh

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok so allow aluminum blocks in pro stock and outlaw pro stock then combind outlaw with pro mod more cars in outlaw or pro mod means more payback right all the pro stock guys with cuts spend 60-80$'entry''to run with pro mod cars anyways Question just ideas for 09

_________________
Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
traveler



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Tampa, Fl.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a hunch you will not see Alum blocks in Pro-stock for quite some time.

As for combining the two classes (outlaw-pro & pro-mod) - you already know I think it could happen - BUT - it is just my opinion. Wink

If we were to limit the rails to one (1) NOS stage / system - I feel the competition would be very close. Power, tires and fuel are all pretty equal. Weight being the only factor that may need some thought.

Some might like to see it - some will disagree all together - But I still think it could make a very exciting class. If promoters & racers want to trim 11 classes down to 7 - well you have to start somewhere.

_________________
terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354

e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hostile projectile



Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 231
Location: paulding,oh

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if it would happen i wouln't want to see pro mod with only one stage.

_________________
Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
demented



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 528
Location: Lake Luzerne, N.Y.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me neither, Even though I only have one stage now Cool . Second stage coming up in near future Twisted Evil

_________________
Quit talkin....Lets Race!!!!

Fred Kowalik
Seriously Demented Racing
MRA member #140
NMRO #2894


www.hrdracingheads.com
www.lincolnelectric.com
www.koehlerinjection.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
traveler



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Tampa, Fl.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes - many run two stage. But I look at like this - you have 3 classes. Outlaw pro-stock, Pro-mod cuts and Pro-mod paddles. by limiting rails to 1 stage of nitrous and combining the 3 classes to make 2 (outlaw pro cuts & pro-mod paddles) The rails would drop down a class (so to speak) so both types of vehicles would still have two classes to run (if they like). This is just food for thought, But it may help make for a bigger class and a possible bigger payout. Promoters & track owner cannot continue to have more then 3 or 4 classes, Unless there is a larger vehicle count in them to help offset the costs. (sponsor support will come only when we can show them unity, stabilization and consistent turnout for shows) I also for see the combining of outlaw super-stock and pro-stock in a similar way (with cuts and paddles also). If we are going to keep weight rules in the classes a simple weight break would be all that is needed to install a balance between these two classes. Smile

Besides It would not stop the rails (Pro-Mod) from bumping -up into class 5 & 6 and adding (using) the second stage.

Getting back on the topic of Alum blocks - If we allowed them for the outlaw pro-stock trucks (in the above scenario - It would give them an unfair advantage over the rails Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Rolling Eyes

_________________
terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354

e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dustydegraff



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 71
Location: archie,mo

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well in the midwest here with my group we allow aluminum blocks,injection,nitrous,dual carbs and back halves/ cut tires and stretch in our prostock we have a class we call pro dot which is just like class 3 now- no nos, dot only,cast block single carb. very popular class around here- and yes most if not all of our prostock trucks can run with and do sometimes beat the pro mod rails. heres a few pics





_________________
Dusty DeGraffenried
MRA REP #106
816-935-5794
ARCHIE,MO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
traveler



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Tampa, Fl.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have seen some of those on the stompers site - looks and sounds like some pretty wild stuff out there. hopefully I will get to see some of them at Tex's race in Oct.

I never realized that they ran / allowed Alum blocks in your Pro-stock class. If I understand you correctly - is it a more popular class then the Pro DOT you mentioned? or did I get it backwards Embarassed

Do you allow rails into the Pro-stock class?? (I think there is a possibility of some real hype for a race of this nature).

Once they figure out the weight issue - (or change the minimum weight for Pro-stock) - the rails will not stand a chance. Razz Razz Razz

_________________
terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354

e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dustydegraff



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 71
Location: archie,mo

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

only ever had two guys run aluminum blocks- one is retired and sold to a guy tin tx and the other one went back to boat racing- both were also the onkly injected trucks in the class. the big thing in this class most of these guys run small blocks and heavy nitrous. we dont allow rails in the prostock class but most of the bump up to the pro mod class and run the nitorus and inj rails. and yes pro stock in my are is more popular than the pro dot- mainly because the equalizer is allowed- nitrous. but yeah im working on getting a big bunch of them to come down to tex's race oct 4th. come see them on the fastrack and then watch some of them tackle the bog. anyways i have some footage from brookfield from last year where a bunch of them all met up and some more from my area if anyone wants to swap videos or dvd's.

_________________
Dusty DeGraffenried
MRA REP #106
816-935-5794
ARCHIE,MO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
adrenalinejunkie27



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Location: Albion, N.Y.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:40 pm    Post subject: what's the diff. Reply with quote

MRA or NMRO, it's all the same. I read the NMRO book when i started, It stated FACTORY BLOCK, then I went to the first event. Didn't know Merlin and Dart were factory's Embarassed I thought they were talking about
Chevrolet & Ford. Boy did I waste a lot of money on a legal motor to run class 3. So smoebody should make up there mind and do it quickly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RoHo



Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 268
Location: Covington,ga.30014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:38 pm    Post subject: Re: what's the diff. Reply with quote

adrenalinejunkie27 wrote:
MRA or NMRO, it's all the same. I read the NMRO book when i started, It stated FACTORY BLOCK, then I went to the first event. Didn't know Merlin and Dart were factory's Embarassed I thought they were talking about
Chevrolet & Ford. Boy did I waste a lot of money on a legal motor to run class 3. So smoebody should make up there mind and do it quickly.


Pro stock MRA reads
ENGINE
1) Any automotive type engine acceptable
2) Engine must be located with # 1 spark plug no more than 12” behind the center of the front axle tube
3) No aluminum engine blocks
4) Any type of cylinder head and intake manifold allowed
5) Maximum of 4 barrels of carburetion (split and stretched Dominators allowed, single Predator only)
6) Vacuum pumps and dry sump allowed
7) No nitrous allowed

Vehicles must meet all safety requirements.



Suggest when building for a particular class of rules ask questions prior to
spending $$$ you might just have a different view than that of the sanction body thet wrote the rules..
It never hurts to ask when in doubt and it might just help you make better deceisions during your build.

Mitch

_________________
Mitch Mitchell
Outlaw Pro stock
MRA #102
NMRO #5000
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mudracersassociation Forum Index -> MRA Class Rules Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2   

 
  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Community Chest


Powered by phpBB
Hosted by FreeForums.org