| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hostile projectile

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 231 Location: paulding,oh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:11 am Post subject: pro stock ''block'' |
|
|
i think that aluminum blocks should be aloud in pro stock as long as the weight is still 3000#'s and were limited to on carb what diff does it make? _________________ Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeff funk
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 242 Location: newton, Ia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:16 am Post subject: Re: pro stock ''block'' |
|
|
| hostile projectile wrote: |
| i think that aluminum blocks should be allowed in pro stock as long as the weight is still 3000#'s and were limited to one carb what diff does it make? |
If the car meets min weight, and it is a unlimited CI class it really bears no reason for a no alum block rule to be in place, IMO
There are alum blocks out there now capable of 900 ci plus, but have fun with feeding it with a single dominator.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shotgun
Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 36 Location: wickliffe, ky
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've had the same opinion for a few years now. minimum weights are a crock also 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Graham
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 523 Location: Missouri, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the issue that may arise is that one would assume if you can run an aluminum block in Pro Stock you could also run one in Outlaw Pro Stock where dual carbs & nitrous are permitted (thus, feeding that 900" monster would be possible).
Scott _________________ Scott Graham
MRA #103
Hot Street Class
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
traveler
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 264 Location: Tampa, Fl.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting !
The two factor that first come to mind are - Weight and Cost. While I do not know the exact numbers - it will take about 150 lbs. off the front end and about $4000 off your wallet. (But I will admit that I have though about alum. small blocks - as a lower cost alternative to a monster big block and to help them make the lower weight).
As for Minimum weights - I personally do not like them. As long as we spec. the chassis and tubing size (for safety reasons).
Just as a reminder - there are Pro-stock cars out there right now that are lighter then some of the Pro-mod rails. With the new rules for MRA Outlaw-pro stock - may become even lighter.
As for the Outlaw Pro-stock class having alum blocks - It would put it so close to the Pro-mod class - that you might as well combine the two (something that I see could happen - because there seems to be a decline in Pro-mod cars and the performance of the two are or will be very close). But that's just my opinion.
As for feeding a 800 or 900 c.i. with one 4 barrel - There are single carbs out there now that flow close to 2000 cfm. Even with a good modified 1250 I have to think that a good tuner could easily push over 1450 hp out of a 813 and with some of the "outlaw fuels" that are out there 1550 - 1600 could be obtainable. _________________ terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354
e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hostile projectile

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 231 Location: paulding,oh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok so allow aluminum blocks in pro stock and outlaw pro stock then combind outlaw with pro mod more cars in outlaw or pro mod means more payback right all the pro stock guys with cuts spend 60-80$'entry''to run with pro mod cars anyways  just ideas for 09 _________________ Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
traveler
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 264 Location: Tampa, Fl.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a hunch you will not see Alum blocks in Pro-stock for quite some time.
As for combining the two classes (outlaw-pro & pro-mod) - you already know I think it could happen - BUT - it is just my opinion.
If we were to limit the rails to one (1) NOS stage / system - I feel the competition would be very close. Power, tires and fuel are all pretty equal. Weight being the only factor that may need some thought.
Some might like to see it - some will disagree all together - But I still think it could make a very exciting class. If promoters & racers want to trim 11 classes down to 7 - well you have to start somewhere. _________________ terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354
e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hostile projectile

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 231 Location: paulding,oh
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if it would happen i wouln't want to see pro mod with only one stage. _________________ Eric Bidlack
mra#133
nmro#3035
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
demented
Joined: 20 Sep 2007 Posts: 528 Location: Lake Luzerne, N.Y.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
traveler
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 264 Location: Tampa, Fl.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354
e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dustydegraff
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 71 Location: archie,mo
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ Dusty DeGraffenried
MRA REP #106
816-935-5794
ARCHIE,MO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
traveler
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 264 Location: Tampa, Fl.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have seen some of those on the stompers site - looks and sounds like some pretty wild stuff out there. hopefully I will get to see some of them at Tex's race in Oct.
I never realized that they ran / allowed Alum blocks in your Pro-stock class. If I understand you correctly - is it a more popular class then the Pro DOT you mentioned? or did I get it backwards
Do you allow rails into the Pro-stock class?? (I think there is a possibility of some real hype for a race of this nature).
Once they figure out the weight issue - (or change the minimum weight for Pro-stock) - the rails will not stand a chance.  _________________ terry slocum
mra rep #109
nmro #354
e-mail - tas565@yahoo.com
386-562-8755 (weekends only)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dustydegraff
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 71 Location: archie,mo
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
only ever had two guys run aluminum blocks- one is retired and sold to a guy tin tx and the other one went back to boat racing- both were also the onkly injected trucks in the class. the big thing in this class most of these guys run small blocks and heavy nitrous. we dont allow rails in the prostock class but most of the bump up to the pro mod class and run the nitorus and inj rails. and yes pro stock in my are is more popular than the pro dot- mainly because the equalizer is allowed- nitrous. but yeah im working on getting a big bunch of them to come down to tex's race oct 4th. come see them on the fastrack and then watch some of them tackle the bog. anyways i have some footage from brookfield from last year where a bunch of them all met up and some more from my area if anyone wants to swap videos or dvd's. _________________ Dusty DeGraffenried
MRA REP #106
816-935-5794
ARCHIE,MO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adrenalinejunkie27
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Albion, N.Y.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: what's the diff. |
|
|
MRA or NMRO, it's all the same. I read the NMRO book when i started, It stated FACTORY BLOCK, then I went to the first event. Didn't know Merlin and Dart were factory's  I thought they were talking about
Chevrolet & Ford. Boy did I waste a lot of money on a legal motor to run class 3. So smoebody should make up there mind and do it quickly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RoHo

Joined: 25 Sep 2007 Posts: 268 Location: Covington,ga.30014
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: Re: what's the diff. |
|
|
| adrenalinejunkie27 wrote: |
MRA or NMRO, it's all the same. I read the NMRO book when i started, It stated FACTORY BLOCK, then I went to the first event. Didn't know Merlin and Dart were factory's I thought they were talking about
Chevrolet & Ford. Boy did I waste a lot of money on a legal motor to run class 3. So smoebody should make up there mind and do it quickly. |
Pro stock MRA reads
ENGINE
1) Any automotive type engine acceptable
2) Engine must be located with # 1 spark plug no more than 12” behind the center of the front axle tube
3) No aluminum engine blocks
4) Any type of cylinder head and intake manifold allowed
5) Maximum of 4 barrels of carburetion (split and stretched Dominators allowed, single Predator only)
6) Vacuum pumps and dry sump allowed
7) No nitrous allowed
Vehicles must meet all safety requirements.
Suggest when building for a particular class of rules ask questions prior to
spending $$$ you might just have a different view than that of the sanction body thet wrote the rules..
It never hurts to ask when in doubt and it might just help you make better deceisions during your build.
Mitch _________________ Mitch Mitchell
Outlaw Pro stock
MRA #102
NMRO #5000
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|